Nate Chastain — In 2022, the dominating NFT marketplace OpenSea faced a host of issues, including allegations of insider trading stemming from questionable NFT trades.
Nate Chastain, a former OpenSea product manager, was charged with wire fraud and money laundering.
He presumably bought hundreds of NFTs before they appeared on the OpenSea website.
In 2022, FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Michael J. Driscoll made the following statement:
“With the emergence of any new investment tool, such as blockchain supported non-fungible tokens, there are those who will exploit vulnerabilities for their own gain.”
“The FBI will continue to aggressively pursue actors who choose to manipulate the market in any way.”
Nate Chastain’s trial began this week, and the former head of product defended himself against “insider trading” allegations.
The charges
Insider trading is the illegal purchase or sale of stocks based on non-public information that the general public does not receive, giving insiders an unfair advantage over other investors.
The claims have been dubbed the “First Ever Digital Asset Insider Trading Scheme.”
Nate Chastain, according to the Department of Justice, used private information to benefit himself by learning about the NFTs that would be published on OpenSea’s homepage.
In the indictment, the DOJ indicated that it planned to have Chastain surrender any and all property or earnings derived from the alleged fraud and money laundering NFT activities.
If Chastain is found guilty, he could face more than 20 years in prison for each of the claims leveled against him.
Nate Chastain was initially charged with wire fraud and money laundering, but DOJ prosecutors expanded their charges to include “insider trading.”
Defense
Nate Chastain’s lawyers have battled the allegations and the words used to describe them tenaciously.
They argued that the case should be dismissed because of the unclear legal environment around NFTs, as well as a lack of legal precedent or regulatory certainty concerning their status as securities or commodities.
“As alleged, acting with purported criminal intent, Mr. Chastain exploited his advanced knowledge of which NFTs would be featured on OpenSea’s homepage by purchasing certain NFTs before they were featured and selling them at a profit after they were featured,” their 2022 filing said.
“The rub, however, is that the NFTs are neither securities nor commodities.”
Read also: Bitcoin mining and SV2 set for big changes
The marketplace
OpenSea is a decentralized marketplace where non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and other digital assets may be purchased, sold, and discovered.
It allows users to create, list, and trade NFTs representing a variety of digital assets such as art, music, domain names, virtual real estate, and more.
The Ethereum blockchain is used by OpenSea to allow users to transact without the use of intermediaries or centralized authority.
It also provides NFT developers and buyers with a wide range of tools and services, including customisable smart contracts, analytics, and broad search capabilities.
OpenSea has gained in popularity in the NFT space, attracting hundreds of creators and collectors to its platform.
Proposals
During a pre-trial hearing last week, Judge Jesse M. Furman asked that Nate Chastain’s attorneys produce a set of jury instructions.
On Sunday, April 23, the defense team submitted the judge with a letter containing numerous opinions that differed from those of the prosecution.
According to Chastain’s lawyers, he is not charged with “insider trading,” hence the charges against him should not use that term.
“The defense disputes that Mr. Chastain’s conduct can be described as ‘insider trading,'” attorney David Miller wrote.
“Whatever understanding you may have about what ‘insider trading’ may be, you should not concern yourselves with it.”
During a pre-trial hearing last week, Judge Jesse M. Furman asked that Nate Chastain’s attorneys produce a set of jury instructions.
On Sunday, April 23, the defense team submitted the judge with a letter containing numerous opinions that differed from those of the prosecution.
According to Chastain’s lawyers, he is not charged with “insider trading,” hence the charges against him should not use that term.
Second proposals
The second set of suggestions from Nate Chastain’s counsel is about those who were harmed by his actions, which is a difficult issue in the trial.
Individual consumers were harmed as a result of Chastain’s actions, according to the DOJ, which urged them to participate in the court case.
Chastain’s defense team, on the other hand, claimed that OpenSea was the sole victim.
They contended in their letter that the jury should only hear from the NFT marketplace.
Judge Furman allowed the Department of Justice permission last Monday to refer to Nate Chastain’s charges as “insider trading.”
